The following proposal for School Marshals in Washington state is republished from the March 15, 2018 Spokesman Review.
There are once again many heated discussions about how to stop the carnage in our schools. A few years ago, we led a group of trial attorneys through an analysis of what it will take for Washington state school districts to seriously tackle the issue of protecting schools. It is apparent that Parkland School District in Florida will have to pay huge sums for its failure to anticipate mass murder that was very foreseeable.
School Marshals- Not Teachers with guns. Many school boards and legislatures in other states have already embarked on a policy of authorizing armed personnel within school premises. Federal and Washington state law both leave it up to school boards to designate who will be armed in Washington schools. Nevertheless, most educators and school boards flatly reject proposals for arming teachers with guns.
There is reason to believe that some Washington state schools are already taking quiet steps, however. Teachers who choose to undertake the training and responsibility of being a school marshal should not be denied the same opportunity to serve as certified School Marshals that we are proposing for other qualified personnel.
Public Duty Doctrine It should not be a surprise to anyone that such matters are insurance driven. Washington state’s Public Duty Doctrine dictates that a policy decision not to deploy armed protection in the schools exposes school districts to very low levels of liability. That is because it is a pure policy decision and therefore immune from liability for almost any accidents that occur.
Prohibitive insurance costs The cost of insuring for accidents on the part of School Marshals is astronomical. Even an accidental discharge or a stray bullet discharged during a deadly force encounter subjects a school district to huge liabilities. Once the policy decision is made to arm school personnel, the gun-handling issues are no longer discretionary policy acts. Rather, decisions regarding imminent use of deadly force leave very little room for discretion. Therefore, school administrators choose to play the insurance actuary version of Russian roulette with the lives of our children and school staff.
Proposed legislation What is needed are state-legislated standards for armed school marshal certification. The proposed legislation will provide districts with an incentive to deploy certified School Marshals who meet or exceed law enforcement standards in areas that are relevant to school safety.
School marshal program By deploying certified School Marshals, school districts should enjoy a legislated grant of immunity from any liability for negligence that occurs due to acts in good faith on the part of duly certified personnel. The grant of district and personal immunity will keep exposure to liability low and act as an incentive for insurance companies to hold down premiums and perhaps even subsidize the continuous training that should be required.
Training standards We are asking law enforcement authorities to propose the standards for training and vetting school marshals and also to participate in drafting the proposed legislation.
Action Training Group Inc. A nonprofit, volunteer group, the Action Training Group presently encourages gun owners at every skill level to participate in action shooting. We present “shoot-on-the-move” drills every month. We also share information related to church safety. The ATG is now beginning to invite teachers and other school personnel to participate in some special training sessions. We want to develop many of the skill sets needed to qualify as a school marshal.
The sky will not fall! Just as the air marshal program began under a cloud of complaints that the sky would fall if we allowed guns in commercial aircraft, we are now hearing that we can’t expect school personnel to safely do what the four deputies at the Florida school failed to do. Nevertheless, a sea change is about to occur in which many districts in Washington will arm certain personnel. Let’s create an incentive for them to deploy specially trained people and lead the way with a model for legislation that can be enacted in other states.
Mark S. Knapp is an attorney licensed to practice in Washington state and leads Action Training Group Inc. Contact him with questions, suggestions or to get involved in any of the activities and efforts discussed above. See firearms lawyer for contact information.
Please share this proposed legislation with your local law enforcement, legislators and school boards. Tell them that even if guns were banned tomorrow, the threats will not stop. The time to be decisive is now, not after more carnage in the schools. For years professionals, including Homeland Security, have advised that organized terror attacks against schools are imminent. If we see terrorist attacks in schools, volunteers will stand in the gap. The only question is whether we will prepare now or wait and act while we lack the ability to take steps that are proper and necessary for such an undertaking.
By advocating that many states ratify the proposed School Marshals legislation, we hope to see Training Providers develop multistate facilities that will provide state of the art training that meets uniform standards. The cost of the program will be on those who opt for the training.
Please note: The Action Training Group, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation and is not offering to provide the advanced training envisioned in the above referenced proposals. The offer is to introduce school personnel to concepts and shooting techniques involving situational awareness and tactical thinking that will be useful for those who decide to obtain further training.
2 thoughts on “Proposal for School Marshals in Washington State”
This is a good start to further this the Schools need to scrape the no gun decal off of the doors which is an invitation for a shooter. And ALLOW parents who have valid concealed pistol license issued by the State through the County Sheriff to carry their side arm while on School Grounds and in buildings as a CPL HOLDER has already passed a background check to get the CPL and is not going to do anything to endanger that. And it is safer for the CPL HOLDER to be in possession of the weapon than the weapon being left in a locked vehicle subject to theft if the vehicle is broken into while the driver is in the building and the vehicle is unattended.!!